Bill O’Reilly just got some great news from a federal judge. Bill has been doing his own thing since the new liberal management at Fox News (Ripert’s sons) kicked him to the curb.
It was a mistake, as all can see, as MSNBC has shot up in the ratings while Fox News has stayed stagnant or gone down.
Sure, the opposition party usually has more energy – see the Tea Party – but what Bill brought to Fox is needed now more than ever.
Bill was famous for speaking truth to power no matter who was in charge and with Fox News under attack for being too close to Trump on a daily basis, Bill would lend credibility to Fox’s retort that they play it straight.
Bill is keeping busy running his own mini-media empire with his books and appearances with Newsmax as well as his website so he is doing fine but the jackals are still out to get him.
So it may come as a surprise to learn that some people are still trying to get money from Fox News and Bill.
Thankfully, the extortionist lost as the judge tossed out her lawsuit handing a much needed win to Fox and Bill.
A federal judge in New York has thrown out a defamation lawsuit filed against former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly and the network.
U.S. District Court Judge Deborah Batts said Tuesday that former Fox producer Rachel Witlieb Bernstein’s allegations of defamation against the host and network are “wholly insufficient,” according to the Hollywood Reporter.
Bernstein alleged in the lawsuit, filed in December 2018, that O’Reilly violated a settlement agreement that was reached when she accused the former TV host of sexual misconduct against her. The agreement called on both sides not to disparage each other.
She claimed that O’Reilly made statements that were meant to portray her as an “extortionate, politically motivated liar.”
“Plaintiff alleges that she has suffered damages to her reputation, severe emotional distress, physical sickness, special damages, and loss of income as a ‘direct and proximate result’ of O’Reilly’s allegedly defamatory statements,” Batts said when granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
“However, she neither explains how her losses flowed from the alleged defamation nor alleges any facts establishing what, if any, emotional and physical harms and reputational damage she specifically suffered.”